从权力导向到规则导向:中美知识产权争端解决机制的演进

沈 鑫

暨南学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4) : 69-77.

PDF(363 KB)
PDF(363 KB)
暨南学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4) : 69-77.
国际法研究

从权力导向到规则导向:中美知识产权争端解决机制的演进

  • 沈 鑫
作者信息 +

From Power-oriented to Rule-oriented:Evolution of Sino-US IPR Disputes Settlement Mechanism

  •  SHEN  Xin
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

自20世纪90年代以来,中美围绕知识产权保护及市场准入问题曾多次发生激烈双边冲突,对中国知识产权制度建立和双边关系都产生过深远影响。此后,中美经贸关系的发展和中国加入WTO,使美国以特别301条款为主导的对华知识产权政策变得难以为继。通过深入剖析美国对华知识产权政策演变的原因及动力,认为正是由于中美经贸关系迅速发展和中国知识产权制度的逐步完善,最终使得两国知识产权争端解决机制经历了由特别301条款主导的“权力导向型”逐渐WTO/TRIPS所确立的“规则导向型”的演进过程。

Abstract

Since the 90s of 20th century,there were a great number of sharp bilateral conflicts on the intellectual property protection and the issues surrounding market access between China and US,which had far-reaching consequences for the establishment of the intellectual property system in China and the bilateral relations between China and US.Since then,owing to the development of China-US trade relations and China's accession to the WTO,the United States'policy on intellectual property(“IP”)toward China that“Special 301” dominated has become unsustainable.Through further analysis on the reasons and motivation of the changes in the United States'intellectual propertypolicies towards China,we conclued that it is the rapid development of China-US trade relations and the gradual improvement of the intellectual property system in China which made the dispute settlement mechanism for intellectual property disputes between China and US experience the process of the evolution from“Power-oriented”which domoniated by"Special 301" to "Rule-oriented”which was established by the WTO/TRIPS.

关键词

规则导向 / 权力导向 / 争端解决机制 / 中美知识产权

Key words

dispute settlement mechanism / Power-oriented / Rule-oriented / Sino-US intellectual property dispute

引用本文

导出引用
沈 鑫. 从权力导向到规则导向:中美知识产权争端解决机制的演进. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版). 2011, 33(4): 69-77
SHEN Xin. From Power-oriented to Rule-oriented:Evolution of Sino-US IPR Disputes Settlement Mechanism. Jinan Journal. 2011, 33(4): 69-77

参考文献

[1]李雨峰.枪口下的法律[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2006.

[2]郑成思.世界贸易组织与贸易有关的知识产权[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1996.

[3]Kim Newby.The Effectiveness of Special 301 in Creating Long Team Copyright Protection for U.S.Company[J].Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce,1995,(21).

[4]Peter K.Yu.From Pirates to Partners:Protecting Intellectual Property in China in the Twenty-first Century[J].American University Law,2000,(50).

[5]凌金铸.美国在知识产权保护国际化进程中的作用[J].江海学刊,2007,(2).

[6]李明德.“特别301条款”与中美知识产权争端[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.

[7]孙哲,李巍.国会贸易代表办公室与美国国际贸易政策[J].美国研究,2007,(1).

[8]孙哲,李巍.国会政治与美国对华经贸决策[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2008.

[9]Warren H.Maruyama.U.S.-China IPR Negotiations:Trade,Intellectual Property,and the Rule of Law in a Global Economy[C]∥Mark A.Cohen et al.eds..Chinese Intellectual Property Law and Practice.Boston:Kluwer Law International,1999.

[10]William P.Alford.To Steal a Book Is an Elegant Offense[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press,1995.

[11]王勇.最惠国待遇的回合[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1998.

[12]许春明,陈敏.中国知识产权保护强度的测定及验证[J].知识产权,2008,(1).

[13]甄炳禧.合作共赢的中美经贸关系[J].国际问题研究,2009,(1).

[14]Michael Yeh.Up Against a Great Wall:The Fight Against Intellectual Property Piracy in China[J].Minnesota Journal of Global Trade,1996,(5).

[15](美)伊丽莎白·埃克诺米,米歇尔·奥克森伯格.中国参与世界[M].华宏勋,等译.北京:新华出版社,2001.

[16]张乃根.试析美国针对我国的TRIPS争端解决案[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究,2007,(7).

[17]陈福利.中美知识产权WTO争端研究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2010.

[18]王杰.国际机制论[M].北京:新华出版社,2002.

[19]杨国华.服从WTO———世贸组织“美国贸易法301条款”案评析[J].国际贸易,2002,(5).

[20]杨国华.中美知识产权问题概观[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2008.

[21]田丰,邵楠.美国为什么申诉中国?[J].国际经济评论,2008,(2).

基金

国家社会科学基金项目《经济全球化与中国电子商务法律研究》(批准号:07BFX079)

PDF(363 KB)

2173

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/