刑事立法的生态化,与环境立法防止环境违法行为的目的可谓不谋而合。因此,加强环境立法与刑事立法的协调,不仅必要而且可行。虽然在实现二者协调的过程中,以“裁判法”为基本定位的刑事立法已经做出了相当多的努力,但囿于现行环境立法自身“行政管理法”的定位,二者之间在事实上并不总是十分协调。鉴于刑事立法天然具有谦抑性、稳定性、补充性,欲结束二者之间这种“貌合神离”的失调状态,关键在于实现环境立法中刑事法律规范的“裁判化”。其中,理想模式是制定环境附属刑法或环境单行刑法;现实模式是通过必要的环境立法设计,从实体法和程序法两个方面为环境犯罪领域中刑法的适用提供更加充分、准确的法律指引或法律依据。

There is no doubt that environmental legislation and criminal legislation have the same goal, which respectively sanction the front-end and back-end of environmental illegal activity. Therefore, the coordination between the two is not only necessary but also feasible. In the process of realizing the coordination between the two, the criminal legislation with the basic orientation of “judgment law” has made considerable efforts. In spite of this, due to being confined in the positioning of the current environmental legislation as “administrative law”, the two are not in fact coordinated. In view of the inherent stability, conservatism and hysteresis of criminal legislation, the key to ending the dissonance between them lies in the “judgment” of criminal legal norms in environmental legislation. Among them, the ideal mode is to formulate the environmental subsidiary criminal law or the environment single criminal law; The realistic mode is to provide more adequate and accurate legal guidance or legal basis for the application of the criminal code in the field of environmental crime from the aspects of substantive law and procedural law through necessary environmental legislation design.