荒谬而危险的“天赋族格”说——关于《论“族格”——试探民族平等与民族自治、民族自决的哲学基础》的质疑

姚新勇

暨南学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3) : 141.

PDF(264 KB)
PDF(264 KB)
暨南学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3) : 141.
中国现当代文学研究

荒谬而危险的“天赋族格”说——关于《论“族格”——试探民族平等与民族自治、民族自决的哲学基础》的质疑

  •  姚新勇
作者信息 +

Ridiculous and dangerous saying of "given nationality"——question in On the Zuge ( Rights and Dignity of a Nationality):A Discussion about the Philosophical Foundation of National Equality,Autonomy and Self-Determination

  •  YAO  Xin-Yong
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

"民族"或"族群"的权利究竟是一定历史条件下的产物或相对性的存在,还是"天然"、"客观"、来自于"民族原初性"的本质存在?如果认为答案是肯定的,并且不分条件、情况、层次地去追求绝对的"民族自决权"和"平等权",那对于建立和谐的族群关系、对于国家的安定,都会产生极大的危害,而且这注定会将各族群人民陷入相互仇杀的万劫不复之境。

Abstract

Is the right of nationality or ethnic group a product in given historical conditions or relative existence or "natural""objective"substantial existence which originate from primary nationality? If that is how we conceive the rights of every nationality or ethnic group and then search for the absolute"right of national self-determination"and"equal right"which is no respecter of conditions,circumstances and levels,the establishment of harmonious amicable ethnic group relationship and the state stability will ...

关键词

民族 / 天赋族格 / 质疑 / 族群

Key words

ethnic group / given nationality / nationality / question;

引用本文

导出引用
姚新勇. 荒谬而危险的“天赋族格”说——关于《论“族格”——试探民族平等与民族自治、民族自决的哲学基础》的质疑. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版). 2010, 32(3): 141
YAO Xin-Yong. Ridiculous and dangerous saying of "given nationality"——question in On the Zuge ( Rights and Dignity of a Nationality):A Discussion about the Philosophical Foundation of National Equality,Autonomy and Self-Determination. Jinan Journal. 2010, 32(3): 141

基金

广东省哲学社会科学规划项目《文化民族主义视野下的转型期民族文学》(批准号:08J-09)

PDF(264 KB)

1636

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/