关于执行和解争议的救济方式,《执行和解规定》第九条赋予了申请执行人申请恢复执行或者另行起诉的“双轨制”救济途径。作为被执行人最终的债权履行方案,无论是恢复执行原执行名义抑或继续履行执行和解协议,都取决于执行和解协议是否存在无效、撤销或者解除事由。上述问题均属实体问题,故应赋予被执行人诉讼的救济途径。关于诉讼途径的选择,鉴于《执行和解规定》第十六条已肯定另行起诉以及债务人异议之诉在我国缺失的现实,进一步完善另行起诉应成为对被执行人实体救济的首选方案。从我国执行和解制度的特殊性出发,另行起诉也可达成停止对执行名义强制执行的效果;对于申请执行人的“双轨制”选择,另行起诉能够周延地覆盖被执行人需要实体救济的情形。但《执行和解规定》第十六条对被执行人需要实体救济的情形归纳并不全面,在诉讼结果对执行程序的影响方面,表述也不明确。对此,应将执行当事人就解除执行和解协议发生争议的情形纳入其中,并明确诉讼结果对执行程序走向的影响。

For the remedy of the disputes in the enforcement reconciliation, Article Nine of the judicial interpretation about enforcement reconciliation gives the application executor a “dual track” relief channel for resuming execution or separate litigation. As the final execution plan of the executed person, restoring execution or continue to perform the enforcement agreement depends on whether the enforcement agreement is invalid, revoked, or released. Since the above questions are substantive issues, the remedies for litigation should be given to the enforced person. As for the choice of litigation, in view of Article 16 of the judicial interpretation about enforcement reconciliation, the relief channels for separate litigation have been affirmed, and the lawsuit of debtor dissidence are lacking in our country. The remedy for the improvement of separate prosecutions should become the preferred option for the relief of the enforced entity at this time. Starting from the system design of China's enforcement reconciliation, the remedy of the executor through a separate litigation can also play a role in stopping the enforcement. For the “dual-track” option of the applicant executor, a separate litigation can also cover all the circumstances in which the executor needs entity relief. However, Article 16 of the judicial interpretation about enforcement reconciliation does not summarize the circumstances in which the enforced person needs entity relief. The expression of the outcome of the proceedings on the enforcement procedures is not clear. In view of the above situation, the law should include the disputes between the execution applicant and executed person over the rescission of reconciliation agreement, and clarify the impact of the lawsuit outcome on the direction of the execution process.