×
模态框(Modal)标题
在这里添加一些文本
Close
Close
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
×
模态框(Modal)标题
×
Toggle navigation
更多内容请点击
Home
Editorial Department
About Journal
Editorial Board
Instruction
Journal Online
Just Accepted
Current Issue
Archive
Most Read
Most Download
Most Cited
E-mail Alert
RSS
Subscription
Contact Us
中文
Figure/Table detail
The application value of AI-assisted compressed sensing in knee joint MRI
NIE Hongyan, ZHAO Yanjie, XING Wen, CAI Wei
Journal of Jinan University Natural Science & Medicine Edition
, 2024, 45(
6
): 667-673. DOI:
10.11778/j.jdxb.20240021
组别
主观评分/分
Kappa值
(95%
CI
)
P
值
医师1
医师2
均值
ACS组
5.00(4.00, 5.00)
5.00(4.00, 5.00)
5.00(4.00, 5.00)
0.79(0.60,0.97)
<0.001
对照组
5.00(4.00, 5.00)
5.00(4.00, 5.00)
4.75(4.00, 5.00)
0.72(0.49,0.95)
<0.001
Table 3
Consistency comparison of subjective scoring results of two physicians
M
(
P
25
,
P
75
)
Other figure/table from this article
Table 1
Comparison of scanning parameters of knee joint Coronal PD sequence between ACS group and control group
Table 2
Comparison of MRI acquisition time of knee joints between ACS group and control group (
t
/s)
Figure 1
Comparison of knee joint MRI between the ACS group and the control group
A: Coronal T
1
; B:Coronal PD; C:Coronal T
2
; D:Sagittal PD; E:Sagittal T
2
; F:Axial T
2
.
Figure 2
Comparison of MRI images of meniscus injury between ACS group and control group
A、B: A 25 year old female with right lateral discoid meniscus and injury; C、D: A 41 year old male with injury to the posterior horn of the medial meniscus of the right knee; A、C: The PD images of the control group; C、D: The PD images of the ACS group.
Table 4
Comparison of objective evaluation results of image quality between the ACS and control group
M
(
P
25
,
P
75
)